Hey, you brought up floating points. I talked about monoids, not floating points. I don't even make the assumption you say I break when I use floating points.

Hey, you brought up floating points. I talked about monoids, not floating points. I don't even make the assumption you say I break when I use floating points. Of course floating points aren't a monoid, let alone a group or a field. > catenation (operation +) is not strictly associative. (Because memory allocation is different!) What the hell are you talking about? The ordering of operation influences the address of the result? Who ever cares about that? Even in C, you don't rely on the value of such addresses —only their uniqueness. > Yet he does this mistake... Step down your high horse.