3 ms·
It's generally easy to maintain on my server. With normally fewer than 40 processes/daemons running at any time, I can reason about what's going on, as opposed
by bangonkeyboard 9y ago
It's generally easy to maintain on my server. With normally fewer than 40 processes/daemons running at any time, I can reason about what's going on, as opposed to Linux or macOS.
Downsides are that much of the system feels stuck in ancient times (there seems to be more support and documentation for tape drives than SSDs), the ongoing removal of sometimes useful software like sqlite from base, and anemic or absent support for secondary hardware platforms and features like Bluetooth.
- PhantomGremlin 9y agoIt's generally easy to maintain on my server. With normally fewer than 40 processes/daemons running at any time, I can reason about what's going on, as opposed to Linux or macOS. This really can't be emphasized enough. It's very simple to see what's running. Right now on my OpenBSD system, when I do ps ax |wc -l the answer is 51. But that's misleading. Because: nsd 5 processes ntpd 3 processes nfsd 5 processes Etc. So there are really very few processes, and they're all easily understood. In contrast, I just tried the same ps on my macOS Sierra laptop that I'm typing this on, and the count was 510. Ten times as many!!! Mere mortals can't easily understand all of that.
- rasz 9y agoC:\Users\me>tasklist /NH | FIND /v "vivaldi" /c 60 Windows 10 minus all the vivaldi (~chrome) processes. You can trim most OSes to the reasonable essentials if you try hard enough.