3 ms·
Which figures are you using to consider their statement absurd? I suppose the 'most' countries part is only true if you restrict it to the usually considered ri
by kybernetikos 9y ago
Which figures are you using to consider their statement absurd? I suppose the 'most' countries part is only true if you restrict it to the usually considered rich countries or 'developed' countries, but that seems like a reasonable restriction to make given the context.
I did a quick calculation based on probably obsolete numbers, but I got a homicide rate of around 4.8 per 100000 of which 2.7 are with guns, leaving 2.1 without which is still higher than most European countries. (check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intention... )
- Sir_Cmpwn 9y agoThe comment I was replying to was: >Americans stab, beat, and bludgeon more people to death that most countries entire murder rate. The US is a violent country even without counting the guns. Which is still not backed up. However, I am surprised to see the stats on the murder rate and gun violence all the same.