4 ms·
Your understanding is sophomore. You haven't uncovered a secret - this is common knowledge. What you don't understand is that actor recognition or brand isn't
by dilemma 9y ago
Your understanding is sophomore. You haven't uncovered a secret - this is common knowledge.
What you don't understand is that actor recognition or brand isn't superficial, or unimportant, or a scam, but serves several important functions. Try to figure out what they are - not everyone but you are idiots.
- alexasmyths 9y agoI never implied that 'people are idiots' - that's your ad-hominem. I am however surprised that so many people think 'highest paid actors' == 'best actors'. And yes, 'brand value' of an actor is absolutely 'superficial' to the nature of the film as a work of art - obviously it's incredibly important (the most important thing) to a big movie in terms of a business, which is why they are paid $$, and it's rather obvious from my comments. I don't for a second disagree with the decision to put 'Brad Pitt' in a big film wherein he might not be 'the perfect fit'. But 'Brad Pitt' is a mediocre actor at best.