If you mean right in the legal sense: Because of freedom of speech? If they think they have something to say about someone, and be it the leaders of my country,

If you mean right in the legal sense: Because of freedom of speech? If they think they have something to say about someone, and be it the leaders of my country, then they have the legal right to say it. If you mean right in a moral sense, I guess my question still is: Why not? If you are negatively affected by the actions of a leader of a foreign country ... why should you not have a right to criticize that? If you have some constructive criticism as to how the leader of a foreign country is doing their job badly and how they could to it better ... what would be the use of not saying so out loud? Couldn't that possibly even be a contribution to their country? I really don't see why having contributed to something would have anything to do with whether you should criticize it or not?! I can see how maybe you don't get a direct say in who gets to be the leader, but that's quite different from criticizing them, isn't it? I haven't contributed to Equifax either, but I still don't see why I shouldn't criticize their leadership?! Or should I? Why? Why not? And how is a country fundamentally different from a company in that regard?