3 ms·
Wow. Jump to conclusions without evidence? Sign me up! More likely it was an attempt to close a perceived tax loophole without understanding of the cost of com
by subwindow 16y ago
Wow. Jump to conclusions without evidence? Sign me up!
More likely it was an attempt to close a perceived tax loophole without understanding of the cost of compliance. I have no doubt it will get fixed before it actually goes into effect.