3 ms·
Cut-through[0] has always been faster than store-and-forward[1]. [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-through_switching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-throu
by stephengillie 9y ago
Cut-through[0] has always been faster than store-and-forward[1].
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-through_switching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cut-through_switching
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Store_and_forward https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Store_and_forward