3 ms·
I do not understand why they're still putting GPUs in laptops under 17". Sell me an external thunderbolt 3 GPU for the rare occasion where I need a GPU, use the
by nickysielicki 9y ago
I do not understand why they're still putting GPUs in laptops under 17". Sell me an external thunderbolt 3 GPU for the rare occasion where I need a GPU, use the space you save for something else.
The difference between entry-level to mid-tier mobile GPUs and Intel's integrated graphics is too small to justify carrying it around with you 24/7.
GPUs are the new DVD drive.
- soared 9y agoMy bet is Microsoft excel. Many users need slightly more power than an integrated gfx card offers.
- ac29 9y agoThis almost certainly would have been more competitive with a i7-7560U instead of a i7-7500U (the former has 2x the graphics execution units and 64MB eDRAM). Same TDP. The only reason I can think to put an NVIDIA dGPU is for people who need CUDA.
- frou_dh 9y agoThat makes a lot of sense actually. I haven't followed the evolution of Thunderbolt, but if such external GPUs are now fully supported and reliable then it's a bit of an inflection point for laptops.
- khedoros1 9y agoI don't want something as large as 17 inches, and having purchased a machine without discrete graphics, I'm kind of regretting it. > GPUs are the new DVD drive. Coincidentally, I'm also missing the ethernet jack and internal blu-ray drive that my last laptop had. Dongles and external hardware suck. They make the whole experience of using the machine more awkward and less streamlined.
- zokier 9y agoOptical drives are really a niche item these days, dropping it is understandable, especially considering the disproportionate space requirements of a drive. But ethernet, that is something I don't want to lose. Not because I can't get internet otherwise, but for getting access to restricted networks, or some quick troubleshooting etc.