Bush, Obama, and now Trump have been increasingly adding new judges that have a tendency to be pro-surveillance. I think this situation is only going to get wor

Bush, Obama, and now Trump have been increasingly adding new judges that have a tendency to be pro-surveillance. I think this situation is only going to get worse in a "boiling the frog" kind of manner, where judges effectively argue that in most practical situations rights such as those given by the 4th amendment are not applied, except in very specific and hard to pinpoint situations. They're already doing this with online data, which seems to have very little 4th amendment protections.