2 ms·
> I have literally never heard a critique > about the negatives of american free > speech Off the top of my head, I consider Citizens United, marketing
by peteretep 9y ago
> I have literally never heard a critique
> about the negatives of american free
> speech
Off the top of my head, I consider Citizens United, marketing of pharmaceuticals directly to consumers, and unregulated TV news to be negatives.
> I do think americans are etc
It remains legal to read this article in all Western European countries. As to banning clothing, there are plenty of places in the US where you can't cover your face. What are actual examples in practice of how us Euros are worse off?
- gspetr 9y ago> What are actual examples in practice of how us Euros are worse off? Off the top of my head: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36055488 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36055488 EDIT: Also this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se-majest%C3%A9#Europe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se-majest%C3%A9#Europe
- fish_fan 9y agoI gave you examples. :) Europeans who wish to wear a hijab may be abused based on where they are; that simple! It is not illegal to cover your face in public in America, and even if it were, the Hijab covers hair; the burkha might cover a face. This article is not what I would be worried about—rather, the anarchist handbook, for instance, or an explanation of encryption, or how to fool facial recognition in public. Nonetheless, you are extraordinarily correct about citizens united, though I would more finger the blame there on corporate personhood, not free speech. The protections still make sense for individual; corporations do not make sense of individuals.