3 ms·
> it would never be actively used against the public. > or to have some charges to throw at people who they have arrested but can't charge. I don't understand
by pricechild 9y ago
> it would never be actively used against the public.
> or to have some charges to throw at people who they have arrested but can't charge.
I don't understand who else it would be used against?
- fredley 9y agoSorry for not being clearer, I'm trying to distinguish between active and passive use of the law. Active implying trying to track down those who are breaking it vs. passive implying using it against those who have been reprimanded already.