3 ms·
Then they should create a program where specific individuals can placed on a deradicalization program and be banned from extremist material. And then make it a
by vt100 9y ago
Then they should create a program where specific individuals can placed on a deradicalization program and be banned from extremist material. And then make it a crime to view the material while you are on that program.
- icebraining 9y agoIn a democratic society, you generally can't put adults in "programs" without their consent, unless they already committed a crime.
- zimpenfish 9y ago> you generally can't put adults in "programs" without their consent, unless they already committed a crime. Sure you can - there's plenty of precedent for e.g. sectioning people into mental hospitals for their own safety or removing people's driving licenses when they might be a danger (without committing a crime - bad eyesight, bad motor control, drug regimen, etc.)
- icebraining 9y agoA driving license is a privilege that comes with rules, taking it away is not the same as imposing unilateral restrictions. Sending people to mental hospitals is a fair example, but that's why I wrote "generally", acknowledging the existence of exceptions. In that case, it's accepted that consent is an oxymoron, which doesn't really apply here.