> I think you're reading too much into a couple sentences typed during my coffee break. Fair point. I impute a lot of selfish motives when I hear what I consi

> I think you're reading too much into a couple sentences typed during my coffee break. Fair point. I impute a lot of selfish motives when I hear what I consider to be ambiguous pro-euthanasia arguments. > The details of determining the individual's mental state (i.e. the method of testing their sanity), documenting that, and preventing abuse of the law. I appreciate you trying to corner this argument with some specifics. I can't convince you, but my contention is that mutable laws and under-manned/inept/corrupt officials can never provide the type of sustained protections for the helpless that I think you're envisioning. Just knowing how loop-holey and unjust so much of American law is, I urge caution.