3 ms·
It's hard to disagree too strongly with a characterization like Russian Shill when you describe a donation to the Clinton Foundation[0] as 'her husband's "gift"
by bmcfeeley 9y ago
It's hard to disagree too strongly with a characterization like Russian Shill when you describe a donation to the Clinton Foundation[0] as 'her husband's "gift"'. Perhaps you'd prefer intentionally deceptive?
0: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-foundation/clintons-charity-confirms-qatars-1-million-gift-while-she-was-at-state-dept-idUSKBN12Z2SL https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-foundation/c...
- wmeredith 9y agoYour linked source there says Qatar literally pledged the money for Bill’s 65th birthday and wanted to deliver the check in person. I think the “husband’s gift” description is pretty accurate.
- rdtsc 9y agohttps://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396 https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8396 --- QATAR - Would like to see WJC "for five minutes" in NYC, to present $1 million check that Qatar promised for WJC's birthday in 2011 --- > hard to disagree too strongly with a characterization like Russian Shill Right, clearly a GRU officer, maybe a KGB one even