How about a limit argument then? Ok if not 10,000 years, why not 500? Still too much? Another 50 then? At what point does this argument tell me I should just k

How about a limit argument then? Ok if not 10,000 years, why not 500? Still too much? Another 50 then? At what point does this argument tell me I should just kill myself right now because I don't "deserve" to live any longer? It seems to me that you've chosen an arbitrary number (current average lifespan) and somehow chosen that to be "fair" and that living any longer is "selfish" and "ego driven". In the absence of modern medicine we might live on average for 50 years. Is living that extra 30 years I might get from technology also selfish? Hypothetically, if everyone can live forever if they want, is it ok then?