4 ms·
Don't know. Why are we not talking about servers in closets and smashed blackberries and bleach-bit? Why, instead, are we talking about those mean old Russian
by pdx 9y ago
Don't know. Why are we not talking about servers in closets and smashed blackberries and bleach-bit? Why, instead, are we talking about those mean old Russians!
Why are we not talking about the Democratic primary rigging? Seems like that's a subject that even liberals should like to talk about (at least half of them), but again, it's Russia Russia Russia.
Seems like there are some folks who would rather change the subject to Russia Russia Russia.
- akhilcacharya 9y agoThere was no primary rigging. The fact that you think this is the result of Russian propaganda, because it works.
- unabridged 9y ago>There was no primary rigging. No vote tampering or anything to that level. But the emails show how embedded the party leadership is with the media and how much they can use their influence. I believe pushing the superdelegate count everyday for months before even the first primary is one of the worst things I've seen.
- dragonwriter 9y agoMedia including committed superdelegates in primary election delegate counts is not at all new (having a candidate that isn't a sitting President or Vice President gain such a strong commitment before a single primary vote is cast is unusual, especially when they don't have similar runaway support in the electorate.)
- lobf 9y agoOh my goodness, are you telling me that the party was more behind the decades-long member who had spent her time building alliances and relationships over the guy who joined the party a few months before?
- s73ver_ 9y agoThere was no primary rigging, and Clinton didn't win the election. You're free to talk about her email server all you like, but she's not in power. So we focus on the people who are in power and how they got there.