3 ms·
Taleb loses me at the end (Nicomachean ethics? come on), but I love his "take risks, but don't take stupid risks" stance. A stance which I first encountered in
by dvt 9y ago
Taleb loses me at the end (Nicomachean ethics? come on), but I love his "take risks, but don't take stupid risks" stance. A stance which I first encountered in How to Legally Own Another Person[1].
The key takeaway is twofold, in my opinion:
- People underestimate tail risk in their day-to-day: Bob smokes and drinks daily and eats red meat and doesn't exercise at all. These are "small" events independent of each other, but the aggregate will probably lead to ruin (probably a heart attack in his mid-50s).
- People overestimate tail risk (due to a lack of courage[2]): Jill says she's "risk averse" and that she won't start a business because it might ruin her -- although in the grand scheme of things, 6 months of your life and a $10,000 investment are not ruin-inducing.
[1] http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/employee.pdf http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/employee.pdf
[2] Maybe dragging ethics into this wasn't such a bad move after all.
- theyregreat 9y agoExactly. I take fish oil, eat a mostly plant-based diet, don’t smoke/drink but live comfortably in a van for cheap. Why? Survival is easy. All risks are not created equal, and following the heard may result in running off a cliff, ie debt, consumption-oriented, spendy, no love/children/friends, workaholism /not enjoying vacations/travel/life and worrying about the wrong things that don’t really matter.