5 ms·
Nice to see people work on git remote helpers, a shame that there's already a fine remote helper that is not tied to a specific hosting provider & uses GPG[0] a
by falsedan 9y ago
Nice to see people work on git remote helpers, a shame that there's already a fine remote helper that is not tied to a specific hosting provider & uses GPG[0] already.
0: https://spwhitton.name/tech/code/git-remote-gcrypt/ https://spwhitton.name/tech/code/git-remote-gcrypt/
- zeveb 9y agoI came here precisely to see how this compares to git-remote-gcrypt (which I use to protect my password-safe filenames). Anyone from keybase prepared to comment?
- ptspts 9y agoI'm not a Keybase developer, but I'm a user of Keybase Git, git-remote-gcrypt and git-gpg, and I've just written a comparison of the 3. Here you are: http://ptspts.blogspot.com/2017/10/comparison-of-encrypted-git-remote.html http://ptspts.blogspot.com/2017/10/comparison-of-encrypted-g... If I missed some of the aspects, please let me know.
- nimnio 9y agoCould you explain what's a shame? I'm having trouble guessing your point.