3 ms·
When was + treated as space in the path part of the URL? Sure it's been treated as space in the query part, but that would be a weird breaking change if early w
by brlewis 9y ago
When was + treated as space in the path part of the URL? Sure it's been treated as space in the query part, but that would be a weird breaking change if early web treated path and query the same way, and then later standards made them different.
- mfer 9y agoAt the time S3 launched the URL spec was RFC 1738 and we had HTML 4.01[2]. And, the URI syntax (all the way back in 1998) noted to use %20 for a space[3]. As far as I can tell, this traces its history back to encoding for forms[4]. It's been used far beyond the encoding for forms and maybe someone can explain why. It's also not just PHP whose function is that way. In Python urlencode encodes as a + (at least in 2.7.x). I remember working on the web many years ago where "+" is what was used. This may have been a spec misinterpretation or something else. In any case, it was common enough. Note, I'm not saying it was right. Just not uncommon. [1] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1738.txt [2] https://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ https://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ [3] https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.4.1 https://www.w3.org/TR/html4/interact/forms.html#h-17.13.4.1