The ultimate conclusion of the article is that, if you hire someone who does not work well with others and doesn't allow other to critique their code, it is goi

The ultimate conclusion of the article is that, if you hire someone who does not work well with others and doesn't allow other to critique their code, it is going to be harmful to your organisation. Doesn't seem terribly interesting. Although the authors definition of a "rock star" coder is someone who doesn't work well with others, I think that the assumption that everyone shares that same definition is mistaken.