4 ms·
Why does he have to be arguing against something..? he's just saying that Waymo's legal machinations were rational based on what they knew at the time.
by Danihan 9y ago
Why does he have to be arguing against something..? he's just saying that Waymo's legal machinations were rational based on what they knew at the time.
- azylman 9y ago> the only way Waymo could find out for sure what had happened was bring a lawsuit. Or do you think Waymo should have just taken Uber's word that it hadn't done anything illegal?