3 ms·
I agree with parts of the article, that big breakthroughs are rarely these days individual efforts, and that praising only the ones at the top is misleading and
by sleavey 9y ago
I agree with parts of the article, that big breakthroughs are rarely these days individual efforts, and that praising only the ones at the top is misleading and potentially damaging; however, as a member of the LIGO collaboration, I think these three guys really do deserve credit for what they've driven over the past 50 (!) years, and all of the work we've been able to do over the years has only been enabled by their drive. While choosing three from thousands is never fair, it's probably more fair than distributing the award equally among anyone who's ever played a part in gravitational wave science.
The recipients have been at pains to make the collaborative effort clear. One of the first things Rai Weiss (winner this year) said on the phone to the Nobel press conference today was that he saw this as an award for the 1000+ scientists in the (LIGO) collaboration. When a special Breakthrough Prize was awarded to all of us last year, with large prize money being given to Rai, Kip and Ron Drever (who died earlier this year and who otherwise might have been one of the three Nobel laureates today), Rai and other senior scientists spent the money funding grad students and other science activities [1]. They have given ample credit to the people that helped in their success, and they've shared their knowledge and resources with the newer generations.
Today, we're celebrating this as a recognition foremost for the three new Nobel laureates, but also to the other pioneers who didn't make the "final three", the diverse collaboration of scientists past and present who've been involved around the world in gravitational wave physics, and all the technicians and students that did the grunt work building the machines and lab experiments. While our names aren't all stamped on the medals, I for one am deeply satisfied to have played some (tiny) part in it all alongside these greats.
[1] http://www.ligo.org/magazine/LIGO-magazine-issue-11.pdf#page=36 http://www.ligo.org/magazine/LIGO-magazine-issue-11.pdf#page...
- KGIII 9y agoWell done. Your post embodies and expresses how I expected the majority of fellow scientists responded to this news. I don't want to say that's how they/you should respond, but that's how I hoped you'd respond. To have even played a small part in LIGO must be an awesome feeling of accomplishment and enable a true appreciation for collaboration with genius. Congratulations on your (tiny) part. The effort that went into the project is mind boggling.
- aquadrop 9y agoYes, I think vision of Nobel prize has changed with years. Now it's mostly regarded as avery prestigious mark to put on "best of the best" but originally it was probably not just award for achievements but a way to distribute money to the people who can really use it to advance science, it's a way to choose from all the people, those who can use the money effectively. That's why they don't award Nobel Prize to dead people, because they can't use those money to advance science any more. And also that's probably why they added a rule to wait for some time before awarding the prize - to check that this achievement is real and person or persons who are related to it can be trusted.