3 ms·

I’ve run a fair amount of email campaigns where we strip out the + if gmail is the domain to ensure it doesn’t end up in some weird filter. Dick move, I know.

I’ve run a fair amount of email campaigns where we strip out the + if gmail is the domain to ensure it doesn’t end up in some weird filter. Dick move, I know. Tell marketing that though. I personally use gmail through a vanity domain and have a catch all rule, so I end up signing up with a fake email account for every domain (hn@mydomain.com) and then the catch all forwards it to my real account (me@mydomain.com).

JoshTriplett 9y ago
> I’ve run a fair amount of email campaigns where we strip out the + if gmail is the domain to ensure it doesn’t end up in some weird filter. At which point you should wind up in the "how widely can I advertise that you're a spammer and all your outbound email should all be routed straight to /dev/null for sending mail to an email address you were never given" filter.
- konschubert 9y ago
  I think that marking the mail as spam sends a signal to their email provider, putting a mark on their account?
  - jsjohnst 9y ago
    Depends on your isp and which email provider they use. The big marketing email services generally do have the feedback loop setup with Gmail though, so yes, you are right.
dragonwriter 9y ago
> I’ve run a fair amount of email campaigns where we strip out the + if gmail is the domain to ensure it doesn’t end up in some weird filter. Which works, until the Gmail users who bother using + addresses with filters start giving all legitimate senders + addresses and sending everything thst doesn't have one and doesn't come from Google straight to deletion (possibly with a stop by “mark as spam” en route.)
- BoorishBears 9y ago
  The problem is not all legitimate sites/sources will actually accept '+' as a valid email character even though the RFC says it's a valid email character.
  - odammit 9y ago
    Jinx. :D
- odammit 9y ago
  Yeah problem with that is the number of crappy regexps sites use that stop you from signing up with a + address in the first place.
ribosometronome 9y ago
Sounds like a great way to get your email marked as spam.
jtokoph 9y ago
I wonder if it could be argued that this violates anti-spam regulations. Depends on how “plus” addresses get interpreted. Are they a different recipient?

JoshTriplett 9y ago

> I’ve run a fair amount of email campaigns where we strip out the + if gmail is the domain to ensure it doesn’t end up in some weird filter. At which point you should wind up in the "how widely can I advertise that you're a spammer and all your outbound email should all be routed straight to /dev/null for sending mail to an email address you were never given" filter.

konschubert 9y ago
I think that marking the mail as spam sends a signal to their email provider, putting a mark on their account?
- jsjohnst 9y ago
  Depends on your isp and which email provider they use. The big marketing email services generally do have the feedback loop setup with Gmail though, so yes, you are right.

dragonwriter 9y ago

> I’ve run a fair amount of email campaigns where we strip out the + if gmail is the domain to ensure it doesn’t end up in some weird filter. Which works, until the Gmail users who bother using + addresses with filters start giving all legitimate senders + addresses and sending everything thst doesn't have one and doesn't come from Google straight to deletion (possibly with a stop by “mark as spam” en route.)

BoorishBears 9y ago
The problem is not all legitimate sites/sources will actually accept '+' as a valid email character even though the RFC says it's a valid email character.
- odammit 9y ago
  Jinx. :D
odammit 9y ago
Yeah problem with that is the number of crappy regexps sites use that stop you from signing up with a + address in the first place.

ribosometronome 9y ago

Sounds like a great way to get your email marked as spam.

jtokoph 9y ago

I wonder if it could be argued that this violates anti-spam regulations. Depends on how “plus” addresses get interpreted. Are they a different recipient?