If at 17 someone was informed among their group that they were he best theatre students in their peer group? Then even in college they are really good at theatr

If at 17 someone was informed among their group that they were he best theatre students in their peer group? Then even in college they are really good at theatre and are mediocre to bad at more “marketable” skills? Do they deserve poverty for not knowing at 17 that even after 4 years or more of education the standard is more like 20+ years of education? Or that making it is not acting skill but networking skill? At 17 people will try to do what they are best at and play to their strengths. That’s really reasonable at 17.