4 ms·
There's a whole lot of may and might in all that; but you have to see it from the perspective of a smoker, not a non-smoker. It's clearly vastly safer than smo
by gnaritas 9y ago
There's a whole lot of may and might in all that; but you have to see it from the perspective of a smoker, not a non-smoker. It's clearly vastly safer than smoking. Any smoker who switched can tell you how they're starting to be able to breath well again, the smokers cough is going away, the lungs feel better and not full of shit. Yes, eciggs may still be more dangerous than nothing, but smokers aren't approaching it from doing nothing.
Eciggs make quitting smoking vastly easier, and eciggs are easier to quit than cigarettes. I routinely go half a day without hitting my ecigg, that never happened with smokes.
- bogomipz 9y ago>"There's a whole lot of may and might in all that; but you have to see it from the perspective of a smoker, not a non-smoker." I was responding the the OP's statement that saying e-cigarrets were unhealthy was a bold claim. There are always things that might be considered less harmful but that does not mean they are considered healthy.
- gnaritas 9y agoMight and may are one thing, the OP said definitely, and that's a bold claim as we don't yet know if it's definitely anything. Had he even said probably that'd be ok, but definitely, no, that's not supportable.
- bogomipz 9y agoSo your contention is that inhaling propylene glycol into your lungs might not be unhealthy? "In its product safety assessment for propylene glycol, the Dow Chemical Company recommends individuals avoid inhaling the chemical"[1] [1] https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a244/ https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/122-a244/