> I hope it's not Rust, because Rust is even more complicated than C++. Erm, have you ever used Rust, and had much experience with C++? Rust's semantics are fa

> I hope it's not Rust, because Rust is even more complicated than C++. Erm, have you ever used Rust, and had much experience with C++? Rust's semantics are far clearer, simpler, and well defined than C++'s, and there are orders of magnitude less rules of thumb that you need to learn in order to avoid. If it looks complex, it's because it needs to be in order to adequately express the essential complexity of systems programming. Hopefully we will have languages that do a better and more elegant job in the future, but at the moment Rust is the best we have.