3 ms·
> your position is the same as I stated but you have rationale behind it. I get that. But it is not. Which I just explained why. The difference is that the thi
by staticelf 9y ago
> your position is the same as I stated but you have rationale behind it. I get that.
But it is not. Which I just explained why. The difference is that the things I complain about is specific examples with data to back it up. The author and other people similar just throw out random shit that is as provable as a religious experience.
> it's speaking to others like me who already know our work environment sucks
Great attitude there buddy.
> think these are claims that need evidence
I provided evidence for the examples I brought up, the rest is just as the authors anecdotal with no evidence. This is my whole point.
> I can only assume you're somehow threatened but I struggle to see how. men feeling threatened by women talking about their spaces is very strange
Why do people always resort to this jargon? I am not "threatened" I just do not like discrimination based on gender and I believe that is happening more towards men than women in tech today. It is happening in the name of diversity and equality.
- rabbyte 9y ago> I just do not like discrimination based on gender if you feel that way then maybe don't drop into a conversation women started to tell them their likely misinterpreting situations and need to provide better evidence before you'll take their claims seriously. maybe don't go point-by-point refuting their experiences as conjecture then center discrimination concerns against men. maybe don't engage others who, like you, don't like discrimination based on gender with the opening line: > People today get upset about fucking everything.