4 ms·
>There is dynamic and then there is crap dynamic. (...) There is crap static too. Excellent. My point exactly. I have no fear of using a static or dynamic lang
by flavio81 9y ago
>There is dynamic and then there is crap dynamic. (...) There is crap static too.
Excellent. My point exactly. I have no fear of using a static or dynamic language, as long as it is a good implementation of a statically (or dynamically) typed language.
- passivepinetree 9y agoWhat would you consider good implementations of either?
- flavio81 9y agoGood "statics": Haskell, ML family, maybe Rust. Good "dynamics": All the Lisp-family languages. Smalltalk. Julia. Lua. Tcl.