2 ms·
I fear that payments based on total number of access or usage would still encourage pandering to the base instincts as with advertising supported model. Paymen
by satya71 9y ago
I fear that payments based on total number of access or usage would still encourage pandering to the base instincts as with advertising supported model.
Payments need to be based on quality of work. The system should ensure that Alex Jones doesn't make much and ProPublica does well.
- jawns 9y agoBear in mind that under the hood, how revenues are distributed in a "cable subscription" model can be as simple or as complex as you want. For instance, let's say you get 10 major publishers on board, and each of them has 25 regional properties. So that's subscriptions to 250 news sites total. Maybe a third of the total revenue gets split evenly among those 10 publishers, and another third gets split based on page views / engagement. Then one-sixth gets distributed based on Pulitzers or other quality-type metrics, and one-six gets distributed based on number of new subscribers brought in by the publisher. Then the publisher can decide how it wants to allocate that revenue. It might employ a similar system to decide how to distribute it to each of its properties. Then the editor can employ a similar system to decide how to allocate the budget to clickbait vs. substantive reporting.