The article didn't say anything about Samsung's numbers. I was replying to bitmapbrother who quoted a value of 250bn. In that case, I didn't understand how 26

The article didn't say anything about Samsung's numbers. I was replying to bitmapbrother who quoted a value of 250bn. In that case, I didn't understand how 262bn>250bn was naive. If the numbers are actually 300bn and 600bn, that's a different story.