Oh! So it's not a story about businesses being prejudice at all. It's a story about bad consumers! I get it. That makes sense. Why would anyone focus on the bus

Oh! So it's not a story about businesses being prejudice at all. It's a story about bad consumers! I get it. That makes sense. Why would anyone focus on the businesses, though, when they're making a perfectly rational decision -- perhaps because the media are making the perfectly rational decision to outrage their audience using weak arguments that, as an added bonus, blame the big bad businessman instead of the average consumer. I also don't understand how you can say that when I cite the obvious example of Greenspan hiring women. How did he survive when everyone was complaining about his bitch of a research assistant? How do companies that hire other minorities do it? Surely someone out there should start opening white-owned laundromats, to capture the valuable racist demographic which has somehow been convinced to patronize the many Korean-owned laundry companies in the US. I would argue the same about a gentiles-only investment bank, but even if banks like that did appeal to prejudice, they didn't do it especially well. If that's your theory, what's your answer: how is it that racism explains how one ethnic group fails, but fails to explain how other ethnic groups are more successful than the racist whites who are allegedly holding them down?