3 ms·
I think the bigger idea is that people who've never actually written serious code in a dynamically-typed language assume that people who do always write a bunch
by ubernostrum 9y ago
I think the bigger idea is that people who've never actually written serious code in a dynamically-typed language assume that people who do always write a bunch of extra unit tests to assert correct types, assert behavior on incorrect types, etc. etc., and that programs crashing due to type errors is a super frequent occurrence.
None of those things are true.
- tome 9y agoAnd yet there are dynamic language proponents in this very subthread suggesting that's exactly what everyone should do.