4 ms·

Sorry you found the game turgid. What exactly does that mean? Are you referring to the writing, the design, the illustrations, the mechanics? I'm mapping the sc

by filiph 9y ago

Sorry you found the game turgid. What exactly does that mean? Are you referring to the writing, the design, the illustrations, the mechanics? I'm mapping the scatter of opinions on the game and precise explanations help me. You're asking about the parts of the system. The noteworthy are: * a STRIPS planner for the NPCs in the game that has to deal with stochastic actions * an NLG subsystem * all the usual game OOP stuff that would work with the above (immutable objects with semantics) * a layered storytelling framework But if you're asking about the 7 years, it's mostly a lot of pivots. The layered storytelling framework was an idea that I had for a very different game last year, for example. If I knew exactly what I'm building, it would take about 6 months of work, even with my limited free time. But that's not accounting for all the things I had to learn-by-doing along the way.

tarboreus 9y ago
I disagree about the "bigness" of the buttons, thought the presentation was notably pleasant. Leaving the old choices was helpful, I scrolled back once or twice to check something and it makes the game feel like you're reading a novel, which is cool. Also, the prose was a little purpleish, which is exactly what you want for a low fantasy Hawardesque fantasy novel (or game), so no complaints there. I think "turgid" is perhaps overstating it.
- falsedan 9y ago
  > the prose was a little purpleish, which is exactly what you want for a low fantasy Hawardesque fantasy novel (or game) No no no, you go big or you go home. You can't be a little bit The Eye of Argon.
falsedan 9y ago
> What exactly does that mean? I meant that it has a lot of parts that don't work well togther: the presentation doesn't match the writing, the writing doesn't match the setting, the slots doesn't evoke a feeling of a contested combat. It feels like a lot of ideas thrown together without an overall vision tying them together. I keep thinging of Inkle's Sorcery! and how well it's put together, or Simogo's Device 6's novel use of text. > a STRIPS planner Well now! I'd love to hear more about this; I didn't notice it in action while running backwards and forwards from the war forges to the corpse room & back while waiting to see if the explicitly-mentioned time-pressure was really a thing or a unconvincing plot momentum device.

by filiph 9y ago

tarboreus 9y ago

I disagree about the "bigness" of the buttons, thought the presentation was notably pleasant. Leaving the old choices was helpful, I scrolled back once or twice to check something and it makes the game feel like you're reading a novel, which is cool. Also, the prose was a little purpleish, which is exactly what you want for a low fantasy Hawardesque fantasy novel (or game), so no complaints there. I think "turgid" is perhaps overstating it.

falsedan 9y ago
> the prose was a little purpleish, which is exactly what you want for a low fantasy Hawardesque fantasy novel (or game) No no no, you go big or you go home. You can't be a little bit The Eye of Argon.

falsedan 9y ago

> What exactly does that mean? I meant that it has a lot of parts that don't work well togther: the presentation doesn't match the writing, the writing doesn't match the setting, the slots doesn't evoke a feeling of a contested combat. It feels like a lot of ideas thrown together without an overall vision tying them together. I keep thinging of Inkle's Sorcery! and how well it's put together, or Simogo's Device 6's novel use of text. > a STRIPS planner Well now! I'd love to hear more about this; I didn't notice it in action while running backwards and forwards from the war forges to the corpse room & back while waiting to see if the explicitly-mentioned time-pressure was really a thing or a unconvincing plot momentum device.