26 ms·
This argument is underwhelming to me. Physicists found that simulating a few hundred electrons (using one particular method) would require more atoms than there
by wakamoleguy 9y ago
This argument is underwhelming to me. Physicists found that simulating a few hundred electrons (using one particular method) would require more atoms than there are in the (known) universe. This is a good argument that we cannot simulate our own universe precisely, but it says nothing about the underlying nature of reality.
Consider if Pacman took some time to study physics. He analyzes Ghost behavior and realizes it would take more than 255 levels worth of data to describe it. Pacman concludes that he must not be in a simulation, because clearly there are only 255 levels in the world.
- AstralStorm 9y agoNot to mention that if you can solve the equations involved you do not need to use the Monte Carlo methods. We cannot yet, but someone else might be able to do it. Heck, even having a good approximation might be enough to entirely change the computation class. (c.f. A* to Dijkstra given provably good heuristic)