Cool, in a mathy way. But it just feels emblematic of the problem of modern engineering attitudes (in that it fetishizes itself over user experience). What I m

Cool, in a mathy way. But it just feels emblematic of the problem of modern engineering attitudes (in that it fetishizes itself over user experience). What I mean is that taking the convenient statistic and saying "seems to be 80% good" instead of looking at the end-user-experience is a huge part of the problem. Psychology studies show over and over that often more choice can lead to less satisfaction, for example. [To point, maybe giving a user 5 bad matches and 1 good match is more likely to result in a date than would giving them 6 good matches. If you don't look at the big picture experience-wise all of your complicated math thoughts may be of 0 or negative value, ironically] Now I get it's much easier to model online dating as though it's a marketplace of assets rather actual (emotional, universally irrational) humans. But I think the real value proposition is in the latter.