I don't see what you said as a counter to the part where you quoted me. I never argued anything to the contrary of your sources. Your answer is an actual good

I don't see what you said as a counter to the part where you quoted me. I never argued anything to the contrary of your sources. Your answer is an actual good faith counter to Peterson's assertions but the part where you quoted me is where I simply state what he's claimed in interviews. I do this because people usually start out by straw-manning him, claiming he's said he's anti-this or that, whereas I'm claiming he's mainly said that his stance is against speech being compelled by law (which is fair game to argue against, as you did, if you think he's wrong). I don't have to agree with his arguments to point out when people straw-man them