3 ms·
Yup that matches my recollection too. I use RawTherapee for all my RAW-processing, and I find it both easy to use, and very flexible. One of the reasons I use
by stevekemp 9y ago
Yup that matches my recollection too. I use RawTherapee for all my RAW-processing, and I find it both easy to use, and very flexible.
One of the reasons I use RT is because it doesn't try to take ownership of my images. I have a hierachy of images that looks something like this:
Images/
Images/2017
Images/2017/10
Images/2017/10/01-jody/
Images/2017/10/01-jody/RAW
Images/2017/10/01-jody/JPG
Images/2017/10/01-jody/JPG/thumbs
Images/2017/10/01-jody/Public/
I like that I can file things my own way, and use the tool just to export from .CR2 -> .JPG.
- brudgers 9y agoIn Darktable, applying styles to the light table `Export` module is a way of sending 'prints' to a standard subdirectory structure. Bash scripts calling darktable-cli might be another possibility for automating a similar process at higher volumes. Having used both Dartable and Rawtherapee, part of the reason I primarily use Darktable is that it seems to better facilitate working through a few hundred images in a few hours...a use case that not everyone has and that some people might reasonably not ever wish to have but one that I deal with based on the type of subjects I sometimes shoot.
- stevekemp 9y agoA 1-2 hour shoot for me with a model might easily result in 500+ images. But I've found with the rating system of rawtherapee it is easy to process such a large number of images efficiently.