It looks shady, I heard in the notes there was the word "donor" mentioned. First it was "donation" but it was corrected later as "donor". https://www.nbcnews.c

It looks shady, I heard in the notes there was the word "donor" mentioned. First it was "donation" but it was corrected later as "donor". https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-opens-momentous-term-monday-n805641 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/supreme-court-opens-mom... Then that meeting in the tower with Trump J., was also shady. Those are good to investigate and find out what's going on. But I wish media would back away and do something else instead of insinuating the smoking gun is right around the corner. Because so far, I don't see that meeting or the Black activism ads influencing election results in a major away, and definitely not to the level of overturning them. I think the Russians but also other countries try to influence US elections. US is world power and who runs for office here affects other countries. Yes, Putin in particular didn't like Clinton, since she criticized his election results (and rightly so, there were some out of whack results like 103% of voters voting for him from what I remember), so Russia probably tried harder. But to me from the beginning, focusing on Russia seemed like a PR campaign more than anything. I gave an example with $1M gift to show the level of evidence, that would be good to see. Imagine we found a copy of a $100M check to the RNC which allowed them to canvass 10x the neighborhoods that the Democrats could or buy more air time or FB ads and so on. That would be more believable.