3 ms·
Yep, it's there, but buried in noise and superflous info. Being neatly concise in journalism seems unfortunately nearly unvalued. I'd appreciate any media tha
by wallace_f 9y ago
Yep, it's there, but buried in noise and superflous info.
Being neatly concise in journalism seems unfortunately nearly unvalued.
I'd appreciate any media that valued a simple information/words metric.
In other words, I shouldn't have to skim read articles like this; the journalist should have efficiently managed the info already.
Not to say long-form journalism is bad, but that's a different style.
- swombat 9y agoThe Economist tends to be very good at this, particularly in the first couple of sections of the weekly, where it summarises the key news of the week, one short paragraph each.