3 ms·
A second look at SCons performance
- prog 16y agoBeing comfortable with Python I tend to use SCons for my C/C++ projects and have been quite happy with it. Though performance is not one of its strengths I like it because: * it is well documented * easy to extend (custom builders) * has a whole lot of standard builders * correct (md5 instead of timestamps as default). For Java, I still use maven though the xml tends to be a pain.
- Gonsalu 16y agoWhat about waf? http://code.google.com/p/waf/ http://code.google.com/p/waf/