3 ms·
Being "against" something does not imply violent opposition. Virtually everyone is "against" something or other, but they don't go around on campaigns of viole
by StanislavPetrov 9y ago
Being "against" something does not imply violent opposition. Virtually everyone is "against" something or other, but they don't go around on campaigns of violence to oppose what they are "against". Personally I am antisocial, not asocial. I am "against" our society because of its makeup and construction, not merely indifferent (in which case 'asocial' would be the appropriate term). My opposition to society, however, is in no way violent. Indeed, embracing violence would nullify and make hypocritical my largest objection to our society (which is largely based on violence).
- musage 9y agoBut are you then against "society in principle", or more against the lack of genuine "socialness", the fake and/or violent structures in specific ones?
- StanislavPetrov 9y agoNo, I'm against the society we have, not the idea of society. Not violently opposed, but opposed on a moral and logical basis.