3 ms·
No it's not. Just because most people's use of the Internet can be summed up by visits to X, Y and Z.com doesn't mean I can't create W.com to take them over. Yo
by oliv__ 9y ago
No it's not. Just because most people's use of the Internet can be summed up by visits to X, Y and Z.com doesn't mean I can't create W.com to take them over. You can still compete.
Without net neutrality, forget about it.
- harryf 9y ago> Without net neutrality, forget about it. Why? I just don't see it. It makes no sense that telecoms companies are going to go after startups that anyway don't have money. But I can imagine YouTube, for example, is another story, given how much bandwidth must be consumed by it.
- apoorvkumar 9y agoHow about Comcast put a straight up 10% equity cost for their 'start-up bundle' to use their 'non-substandard' channel? Would you be ok with that?
- oconnore 9y agoDo you want an FTC antitrust case? Because this is how you get an FTC antitrust case...
- apoorvkumar 9y agoThe net providers and Ajit Pai's would sell it as a 'premium feature' being made available to poor start-ups at a discount. FTC can't go after Amazon for giving out large AWS servers to start ups for some equity.