3 ms·
"Many cases" is subjective and anecdotal. Maybe my set of youtubers i followed was particularly high quality, but almost all uses of annotations i have seen wer
by Mithaldu 9y ago
"Many cases" is subjective and anecdotal. Maybe my set of youtubers i followed was particularly high quality, but almost all uses of annotations i have seen were to provide corrections to information found wrong in the video, or additional information learned after the video.
In some cases such things were applied quite heavily too.
And thus the point of my previous post is that for people doing serious work with their youtube videos providing corrections and such via the description is entirely untenable.
I'm sorry you've only seen spam, but cutting off another's tool because some people can't use it correctly is a severe case of FYGM.
- anyfoo 9y agoI don't know why you got downvoted so much, I share the same experience.
- Mithaldu 9y agoI expect it's a side effect from casual youtube users who've mostly experienced abuse of the feature and think i'm lying.
- taneq 9y agoI don't really have a "set of youtubers" that I follow and so most of the stuff I watch is from random sources. I think you're right that it depends hugely on who you're watching - random hobby / extreme sports videos seem to be particularly bad, but technical and engineering videos are usually fine. I don't think they should take it away completely, just limit it so avoid the aforementioned 'myspace page' overuse.