3 ms·
This is a deeply-researched, well-written exposé on a troubling, ongoing injustice. But you're giving up after two paragraphs, badmouthing the publication, and
by matt4077 9y ago
This is a deeply-researched, well-written exposé on a troubling, ongoing injustice.
But you're giving up after two paragraphs, badmouthing the publication, and the author, because they don't start with the glossary?
FWIW, "gravity knifes" are defined when the article turns to the legal situation. In making readers wait a bit, the article may actually be trying to recreate the thoughts of these people caught up in the law: "WTF is a gravity knife?"
But, wow, it must suck to be a good journalist these days with these sorts of readers.
- nailer 9y ago> But you're giving up after two paragraphs No. As other posters have mentioned the definition appears at 3,376 words through. Have you read the article for yourself, or did you just make up 'two paragraphs' to attack others? It's not a 'well written expose'. It's clickbait hiding the meat of the article 3000 words deep for more ad views at the expense of a working narrative. You could happily title it 'guess what this obscure new york law is' and then made a series of slides hiding the answer on the tenth.