3 ms·
I did, didn't work, went back to Chrome. It was faster and had a smaller memory footprint than I remember, which was great. It also started stuttering on my ma
by EpicEng 9y ago
I did, didn't work, went back to Chrome.
It was faster and had a smaller memory footprint than I remember, which was great. It also started stuttering on my macs every ~5 seconds or so. The page would just lock up. Couldn't find a solution. The only hints were to disable graphics acceleration, but those were years old.
On my windows machines it crashed, and crashed hard. Single tab has an issue, the entire browser crashed. Lost work.
No thanks FF, I'll try again in another decade.
- eat_veggies 9y agoFor pre beta software, that's perfectly understandable.
- EpicEng 9y agoNot pre-beta, it was the official stable version. I should have made that clear.
- 3131s 9y ago> No thanks FF, I'll try again in another decade. You should hope that you'll have the option to do so in a decade, or maybe by then we'll all be getting extorted by Google after they've strangled the open web to death.
- EpicEng 9y agoRight. A bit dramatic, but I guess I'm in the same camp as the vast majority of other people out there who just wants a browser that doesn't get in my way.
- EpicEng 9y agoTo be clear; this was the stable version. I apologize that your favorite browser didn't work well for me.