4 ms·
I was under the impression that Zuckerberg had children. How then can calling him impotent be anything but metaphorical? In any case, this is clearly not haras
by syrrim 9y ago
I was under the impression that Zuckerberg had children. How then can calling him impotent be anything but metaphorical?
In any case, this is clearly not harassment for a very simple reason: it is not directed at Zuckerberg. Even were Zuckerberg to be hurt by these claims, he is unlikely to see them without seeking them out, and so won't be harmed by them.
- samayylmao 9y agoI guess it really depends on what definition of impotent you use. To quote the author: "He’s impotent because he is captive to something else." linking to another article by the author about how skynet (well the idea of it) is becoming a reality. This author has quite a few posts that make some very strange and out there claims.