4 ms·
The plan is good and modestly aggressive time-wise. But he has to be careful. Even a single high-profile disaster with human loss or precious cargo will put the
by kensai 9y ago
The plan is good and modestly aggressive time-wise. But he has to be careful. Even a single high-profile disaster with human loss or precious cargo will put the whole endeavor at risk.
- nickik 9y ago> Even a single high-profile disaster with human loss or precious cargo will put the whole endeavor at risk. Why? This is not a government bureaucracy. People die in many places in private business. As long the company has high level of assurance that they will not get sued or regulated, I don't see how a failure could collapse the whole endeavor.
- namelost 9y agoIn the US, the value of someone's life depends on their citizenship, so they can perhaps get around this problem by only crewing their rocket with non-Americans.
- nickik 9y agoDon't Americans die in coal mines? Don't Americans die on construction cites. Don't pilots die in air travel accidents?
- ChelloYello 9y agoNobody said Americans don't die too, just that the US values American lives much above other human lives. For really obvious illustrations of this fact see for instance the Irak war (pick one), or migrant deaths along the US - Mexico border.
- andygates 9y agoEarly airlines are the closest comparison, and as design flaws and bad practice killed off crews and destroyed vehicles, they were regulated to heck and back and are better for it.
- nickik 9y agoEarly airlines were regulated but not to the point where it was basically in a gridlock. This was one of the issues with NASA, they became so risk averse because of the impact it had on their budget.
- kensai 9y agoYou don't but I do. People will be scared. And there is no competition at the moment, he plays alone. People might think it's too early, it's not worth it, etc.