I don't need help understanding how the analogy to car automation is wrong, I get that. I gave it as an example of how automation did not reduce prices. The 'g

I don't need help understanding how the analogy to car automation is wrong, I get that. I gave it as an example of how automation did not reduce prices. The 'good faith' part which the responders are failing at is badgering me to accept their explanations of car manufacturing in place of farm automation. I accept their explanations but it does not help me understand this: Why does the GP think that agricultural automation caused the decline in prices? If I again get a response talking about cars: I don't get it. I don't understand. I can't work it out. I need help to see the connection. It doesn't make sense to me. Please, help me understand instead of deriding me for not accepting an explanation about car manufacturing as an substitute.