> you just said if you ever are infertile you're not "male". For a computer person, your logic sure is weak. "If you've ever produced small, motile gametes, t

> you just said if you ever are infertile you're not "male". For a computer person, your logic sure is weak. "If you've ever produced small, motile gametes, then you're male." "If you've never produced small, motile gametes, then you're not male." P → Q does not entail ¬P → ¬Q. Literally 100-level propositional logic, here. > Fertility and reproduction have very little to do with 'gender' except where people attempting societal manipulation try and force it to. From a scientific perspective the correlations are minimal and difficult to measure. Who's talking about gender, here? I'm not. I'm talking about sex; specifically, the material basis for reproductive roles and the exploitation of female (sorry, AFAB) reproductive function for the advantage of male (sorry, AMAB) people.