6 ms·
SF is also a lot cheaper. With VAT, you're looking at £705.60 for sitebulb per year, vs £149.00 per year for SF. That's a really big price difference and you'd
by scaryclam 9y ago
SF is also a lot cheaper. With VAT, you're looking at £705.60 for sitebulb per year, vs £149.00 per year for SF. That's a really big price difference and you'd have to be really sure it's worth it.
In addition SF works on Ubuntu, which is another point in its favour.
- hathawayp 9y agoI know right, SF is just too cheap for its own good! :p We think it's a case of horses for courses. Sitebulb has the potential to save you a ton of time when auditing and reporting. If you don't do a lot of that then it might not be a good option for you. If you do, that's where a lot of the value lies. There's a fully featured 2 week trial to give it a proper go, and the monthly billing means you have the option to switch it on/off as you need it.